This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62005TO0089
Order of the Court of First Instance (Fourth Chamber) of 27 October 2005. # Groupement agricole d'exploitation en commun reconnu Salat Jean et Michel (GAEC Salat) v Commission of the European Communities. # Action for failure to act - Complaint concerning the protected designation of origin ‘Salers’ - Regulation (EC) No 828/2003 - Definition of position by the Commission - Manifest inadmissibility. # Case T-89/05.
Order of the Court of First Instance (Fourth Chamber) of 27 October 2005.
Groupement agricole d'exploitation en commun reconnu Salat Jean et Michel (GAEC Salat) v Commission of the European Communities.
Action for failure to act - Complaint concerning the protected designation of origin ‘Salers’ - Regulation (EC) No 828/2003 - Definition of position by the Commission - Manifest inadmissibility.
Case T-89/05.
Order of the Court of First Instance (Fourth Chamber) of 27 October 2005.
Groupement agricole d'exploitation en commun reconnu Salat Jean et Michel (GAEC Salat) v Commission of the European Communities.
Action for failure to act - Complaint concerning the protected designation of origin ‘Salers’ - Regulation (EC) No 828/2003 - Definition of position by the Commission - Manifest inadmissibility.
Case T-89/05.
Izvješća Suda EU-a 2005 II-00016*
ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:T:2005:382
Order of the Court of First Instance (Fourth Chamber) of 27 October 2005 − GAEC Salat v Commission
(Case T-89/05)
Action for failure to act – Complaint concerning the protected designation of origin ‘Salers’ – Regulation (EC) No 828/2003 – Definition of position by the Commission – Manifest inadmissibility
1. Actions for failure to act – Failure remedied before commencement of proceedings – Inadmissibility – Definition of position failing to satisfy the applicant – Not relevant (Art. 232 EC) (see paras 19, 22)
2. Actions for failure to act – Natural or legal persons – Actionable omissions – Omission to initiate proceedings for failure to act – Inadmissibility (Arts 226 EC and 232, third para., EC) (see paras 24-25)
3. Procedure – Application initiating proceedings – Establishment of the subject-matter of a claim – Amendment of the forms of order initially sought at the stage of observations on the plea as to inadmissibility – Inadmissibility (Rules of Procedure of the Court of First Instance, Arts 44(1) and 48(2)) (see para. 28)
Re:
ACTION for declaration of failure to act in that the Commission failed to adopt a decision on the applicant’s complaint against the French Republic |
Operative part
The Court:
|
Dismisses the action as manifestly inadmissible; |
|
Orders the applicant to pay the costs. |