This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62004TA0279
Case T-279/04: Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 13 September 2010 — Éditions Jacob v Commission (Competition — Concentrations — French-language publishing — Decision declaring the concentration compatible with the common market subject to sale of assets — Action for annulment brought by an unsuccessful prospective purchaser — Obligation to state reasons — Fraud — Error of law — Manifest error of assessment — Regulation (EEC) No 4064/89)
Case T-279/04: Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 13 September 2010 — Éditions Jacob v Commission (Competition — Concentrations — French-language publishing — Decision declaring the concentration compatible with the common market subject to sale of assets — Action for annulment brought by an unsuccessful prospective purchaser — Obligation to state reasons — Fraud — Error of law — Manifest error of assessment — Regulation (EEC) No 4064/89)
Case T-279/04: Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 13 September 2010 — Éditions Jacob v Commission (Competition — Concentrations — French-language publishing — Decision declaring the concentration compatible with the common market subject to sale of assets — Action for annulment brought by an unsuccessful prospective purchaser — Obligation to state reasons — Fraud — Error of law — Manifest error of assessment — Regulation (EEC) No 4064/89)
SL C 301, 6.11.2010, p. 20–20
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
6.11.2010 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 301/20 |
Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 13 September 2010 — Éditions Jacob v Commission
(Case T-279/04) (1)
(Competition - Concentrations - French-language publishing - Decision declaring the concentration compatible with the common market subject to sale of assets - Action for annulment brought by an unsuccessful prospective purchaser - Obligation to state reasons - Fraud - Error of law - Manifest error of assessment - Regulation (EEC) No 4064/89)
2010/C 301/29
Language of the case: French
Parties
Applicant: Éditions Odile Jacob SAS (Paris, France) (represented by: O. Fréget, W. van Weert, I. de Seze, M. Struys, M. Potel and L. Eskenazi, lawyers
Defendant: European Commission (represented by: initially A. Whelan, O. Beynet, A. Bouquet and F. Arbault, then A. Bouquet and O. Beynet, acting as Agents)
Intervener in support of the defendant: Lagardère SCA (Paris) (represented by: initially A. Winckler and I. Girgenson, then A. Winckler, F. de Bure and J.-B. Pinçon, lawyers
Re:
Application for the annulment of Commission Decision 2004/422/EC of 7 January 2004 declaring a concentration to be incompatible with the common market and the functioning of the EEA Agreement (Case COMP/M.2978 — Lagardère/Natexis/VUP) (OJ 2004 L 125, p. 54).
Operative part of the judgment
The General Court:
|
1. |
dismisses the action; |
|
2. |
orders Éditions Odile Jacob SAS to bear its own costs and to pay the costs of the European Commission and Lagardère SCA. |