Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document C:2011:145:TOC

    Official Journal of the European Union, C 145, 14 May 2011


    Display all documents published in this Official Journal
     

    ISSN 1725-2423

    doi:10.3000/17252423.C_2011.145.eng

    Official Journal

    of the European Union

    C 145

    European flag  

    English edition

    Information and Notices

    Volume 54
    14 May 2011


    Notice No

    Contents

    page

     

    IV   Notices

     

    NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

     

    Court of Justice of the European Union

    2011/C 145/01

    Last publication of the Court of Justice of the European Union in the Official Journal of the European UnionOJ C 139, 7.5.2011

    1


     

    V   Announcements

     

    COURT PROCEEDINGS

     

    Court of Justice

    2011/C 145/02

    Case C-385/08: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 22 December 2010 — European Commission v Republic of Poland (Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Accession of new Member States — Marketing authorisations for medicinal products that are generics of the reference product Plavix — Conditional decisions authorising the marketing of pharmaceutical products — Infringement of the acquis)

    2

    2011/C 145/03

    Case C-27/11: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Administrativen sad Sofia — grad (Bulgaria) lodged on 17 January 2011 — Anton Vinkov v Nachalnik Administrativno-nakazatelna deynost

    3

    2011/C 145/04

    Case C-32/11: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Magyar Köztársaság Legfelsőbb Bírósága (Hungary) lodged on 21 January 2011 — Allianz Hungária Biztosító Zrt., Generali-Providencia Biztosító Zrt., Gépjármű Márkakereskedők Országos Szövetsége, Magyar Peugeot Márkakereskedők Biztosítási Alkusz Kft. And Paragon-Alkusz Zrt., legal successor of Magyar Opelkereskedők Bróker Kft. v Gazdasági Versenyhivatal

    4

    2011/C 145/05

    Case C-40/11: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgerichtshof Baden-Württemberg (Germany) lodged on 28 January 2011 — Yoshikazu Iida v City of Ulm

    4

    2011/C 145/06

    Case C-44/11: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesfinanzhof (Germany) lodged on 31 January 2011 — Finanzamt Frankfurt am Main V-Höchst v Deutsche Bank AG

    6

    2011/C 145/07

    Case C-49/11: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Oberlandesgericht Wien (Austria) lodged on 3 February 2011 — Content Services Ltd v Bundesarbeitskammer

    6

    2011/C 145/08

    Case C-56/11: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Oberlandesgericht Düsseldorf (Germany) lodged on 8 February 2011 — Raiffeisen-Waren-Zentrale Rhein-Main e.G. v Saatgut-Treuhandverwaltungs GmbH

    7

    2011/C 145/09

    Case C-62/11: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Hessisches Landessozialgericht, Darmstadt (Germany) lodged on 10 February 2011 — Florence Feyerbacher v Land Hessen, represented by the Regierungspräsidium Gießen

    7

    2011/C 145/10

    Case C-68/11: Action brought on 16 February 2011 — European Commission v Italian Republic

    8

    2011/C 145/11

    Case C-69/11: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Rechtbank van eerste aanleg te Brugge (Belgium), lodged on 16 February 2011 — Connoisseur Belgium BVBA v Belgische Staat

    8

    2011/C 145/12

    Case C-83/11: Reference for a preliminary ruling from Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) London (United Kingdom) made on 22 February 2011 — Secretary of State for the Home Department v Muhammad Sazzadur Rahman, Fazly Rabby Islam, Mohibullah Rahman

    9

    2011/C 145/13

    Case C-84/11: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Korkein hallinto-oikeus (Finland) lodged on 24 February 2011 — Marja-Liisa Susisalo, Olli Tuomaala, Merja Ritala

    9

    2011/C 145/14

    Case C-85/11: Action brought on 24 February 2011 — European Commission v Ireland

    10

    2011/C 145/15

    Case C-86/11: Action brought on 24 February 2011 — European Commission v United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland

    11

    2011/C 145/16

    Case C-98/11 P: Appeal brought on 1 March 2011 by Chocoladefabriken Lindt & Sprüngli AG against the judgment of the General Court (FirstChamber) delivered on 17 December 2010 in Case T-336/08 Chocoladefabriken Lindt & Sprüngli AG v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

    11

    2011/C 145/17

    Case C-100/11 P: Appeal brought on 2 March 2011 by Helena Rubinstein, L'Oréal against the judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) delivered on 16 December 2010 in Case T-345/08: Helena Rubinstein SNC, L'Oréal SA v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs), Allergan, Inc.

    12

    2011/C 145/18

    Case C-103/11 P: Appeal brought on 2 March 2011 by the European Commission against the judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) delivered on 16 December 2010 in Case T-19/07 Systran and Systran Luxembourg v Commission

    13

    2011/C 145/19

    Case C-108/11: Action brought on 2 March 2011 — European Commission v Ireland

    13

    2011/C 145/20

    Case C-117/11: Reference for a preliminary ruling from Upper Tribunal (Tax and Chancery Chamber) (United Kingdom) made on 4 March 2011 — Purple Parking Ltd, Airparks Services Ltd v The Commissioners for Her Majesty's Revenue & Customs

    14

    2011/C 145/21

    Case C-118/11: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Administrativen sad Varna (Bulgaria) lodged on 7 March 2011 — Eon Asset Management OOD v Direktor na Direktsia ‘Obzhalvane i upravlenie na izpalnenieto’

    15

    2011/C 145/22

    Case C-119/11: Action brought on 4 March 2011 — European Commission v French Republic

    16

    2011/C 145/23

    Case C-120/11: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale di Santa Maria Capua Vetere (Italy) lodged on 7 March 2011 — Criminal proceedings against Yeboah Kwadwo

    17

    2011/C 145/24

    Case C-123/11: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Korkein hallinto-oikeus (Finland) lodged on 9 March 2011 — A Oy

    17

    2011/C 145/25

    Case C-129/11: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Administrativen Sad Varna (Bulgaria) lodged on 14 March 2011 — OOD Provadiinvest v Direktor na Direktsia ‘Obzhalvane i upravlenie na izpalnenieto’

    17

     

    General Court

    2011/C 145/26

    Case T-375/06: Judgment of the General Court of 24 March 2011 — Viega v Commission (Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Copper and copper alloy fittings sector — Decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC — Participation in the infringement — Obligation to state reasons — Fines — Relevant turnover — Attenuating circumstances)

    19

    2011/C 145/27

    Case T-376/06: Judgment of the General Court of 24 March 2011 — Legris Industries v Commission (Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Copper and copper alloy fittings sector — Decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC — Imputability of the infringement)

    19

    2011/C 145/28

    Case T-377/06: Judgment of the General Court of 24 March 2011 — Comap v Commission (Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Copper and copper alloy fittings sector — Decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC — Duration of participation in the infringement — Fines — Determination of the starting amount of the fine — Proportionality)

    19

    2011/C 145/29

    Case T-378/06: Judgment of the General Court of 24 March 2011 — IMI and Others v Commission (Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Copper and copper alloy fittings sector — Decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC — Fines — Relevant turnover — Leniency Notice — Guidelines on the method of setting fines — Equal treatment)

    20

    2011/C 145/30

    Case T-379/06: Judgment of the General Court of 24 March 2011 — Kaimer and Others v Commission (Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Copper and copper alloy fittings sector — Decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC — Rights of the defence — Participation in the infringement — Duration of the infringement — Fines — Attenuating circumstances — Proportionality — Equal treatment)

    20

    2011/C 145/31

    Case T-381/06: Judgment of the General Court of 24 March 2011 — FRA.BO v Commission (Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Copper and copper alloy fittings sector — Decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC — Fines — Leniency Notice — Guidelines on the method of setting fines — Attenuating circumstances — Immunity from fines — Legitimate expectations — Equal treatment)

    21

    2011/C 145/32

    Case T-382/06: Judgment of the General Court of 24 March 2011 — Tomkins v Commission (Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Copper and copper alloy fittings sector — Decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC — Imputability of the infringement — Duration of the infringement)

    21

    2011/C 145/33

    Case T-384/06: Judgment of the General Court of 24 March 2011 — IBP and International Building Products France v Commission (Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Copper and copper alloy fittings sector — Decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC — Duration of participation in the infringement — Fines — Aggravating circumstances)

    22

    2011/C 145/34

    Case T-385/06: Judgment of the General Court of 24 March 2011 — Aalberts Industries and Others v Commission (Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Copper and copper alloy fittings sector — Decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC — Single and continuous infringement — Participation in the infringement)

    22

    2011/C 145/35

    Case T-386/06: Judgment of the General Court of 24 March 2011 — Pegler v Commission (Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Copper and copper alloy fittings sector — Decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC — Imputability of the infringement — Fines — Deterrent effect)

    23

    2011/C 145/36

    Case T-214/07: Judgment of the General Court of 31 March 2011 — Greece v Commission (EAGGF — Guarantee Section — Expenditure excluded from Community financing — Arable crops — Specific measures for certain agricultural products in favour of the smaller Aegean islands)

    23

    2011/C 145/37

    Case T-117/08: Judgment of the General Court of 31 March 2011 — Italy v EESC (Rules on the use of languages — Vacancy notice concerning the recruitment of the Secretary-General of the EESC — Publication in three official languages — Information relating to the vacancy notice — Publication in all official languages — Action for annulment — Admissibility — Articles 12 EC and 290 EC — Article 12 of the CEOS — Regulation No 1)

    23

    2011/C 145/38

    Joined Cases T-443/08 and T-455/08: Judgment of the General Court of 24 March 2011 — Freistaat Sachsen and Others v Commission (State aid — Aid for Leipzig/Halle Airport — Funding of investments relating to the construction of the new southern runway — Decision declaring aid compatible with the common market — Actions for annulment — No interest in bringing proceedings — Inadmissibility — Concept of ‘undertaking’ — Concept of ‘economic activity’ — Airport infrastructure)

    24

    2011/C 145/39

    Case T-33/09: Judgment of the General Court of 29 March 2011 — Portugal v Commission (Non-compliance with a judgment of the Court of Justice establishing a failure to fulfil obligations — Penalty payment — Claim for payment — Repeal of the legislation at issue)

    24

    2011/C 145/40

    Case T-54/09: Judgment of the General Court of 24 March 2011 — XXXLutz Marken v OHIM — Natura Selection (Linea Natura Natur hat immer Stil) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for Community figurative mark Linea Natura Natur hat immer Stil — Earlier Community figurative mark natura selection — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Similarity of the signs — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))

    25

    2011/C 145/41

    Case T-149/09: Judgment of the General Court of 24 March 2011 — Dover v Parliament (Rules governing the payment of expenses and allowances to Members of the European Parliament — Review of the use of allowances — Parliamentary assistance allowance — Justification of expenditure — Recovery of undue payments)

    25

    2011/C 145/42

    Case T-184/09: Judgment of the General Court of 24 March 2011 — Greece v Commission (EAGGF — Guarantee Section — Expenditure excluded from Community financing — Common organisation of the markets in the sugar sector — Article 8(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1663/95 and Article 11(1) and (2) of Regulation (EC) No 885/2006 — Assessment of the risk of financial loss to the EAGGF — Principle of proportionality)

    26

    2011/C 145/43

    Case T-419/09: Judgment of the General Court of 24 March 2011 — Cybergun v OHIM — Umarex Sportwaffen (AK 47) (Community trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — Community word mark AK 47 — Absolute ground for refusal — Descriptive character — Article 7(1)(c) and Article 52(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)

    26

    2011/C 145/44

    Case T-503/09: Judgment of the General Court of 24 March 2011 — Cybergun v OHIM — Umarex Sportwaffen (AK 47) (Community trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — Community word mark AK 47 — Absolute ground for refusal — Descriptive character — Article 7(1)(c) and Article 52(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)

    26

    2011/C 145/45

    Case T-14/10: Judgment of the General Court of 24 March 2011 — CheckMobile v OHIM (carcheck) (Community trade mark — Application for Community word mark ‘carcheck’ — Absolute ground for refusal — Descriptive character — Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)

    27

    2011/C 145/46

    Joined Cases T-139/10, T-280/10 to T-285/10 and T-349/10 to T-352/10: Order of the General Court of 21 March 2011 — Milux v OHIM (REFLUXCONTROL and Others) (Community trade mark — Representation of the applicant by a lawyer who is not a third party — Inadmissibility)

    27

    2011/C 145/47

    Case T-175/10: Order of the General Court of 21 March 2011 — Milux v OHIM (FERTILITYINVIVO) (Community trade mark — Representation of the applicant by a lawyer who is not a third party — Inadmissibility)

    28

    2011/C 145/48

    Case T-100/11: Action brought on 17 February 2011 — MSE Pharmazeutika v OHIM — Merck Sharp & Dohme (SINAMIT)

    28

    2011/C 145/49

    Case T-112/11: Action brought on 23 February 2011 — Schutzgemeinschaft Milch und Milcherzeugnisse v Commission

    29

    2011/C 145/50

    Case T-113/11: Action brought on 23 February 2011 — Schutzgemeinschaft Milch und Milcherzeugnisse v Commission

    30

    2011/C 145/51

    Case T-125/11: Action brought on 28 February 2011 — Centre national de la recherche scientifique v Commission

    31

    2011/C 145/52

    Case T-149/11: Action brought on 11 March 2011 — GS v Parliament and Council

    31

    2011/C 145/53

    Case T-151/11: Action brought on 11 March 2011 — Telefónica de España and Telefónica Móviles España v Commission

    32

    2011/C 145/54

    Case T-159/11: Action brought on 10 March 2011 — Marszałkowski v OHIM — Mar-Ko Fleischwaren (WALICHNOWY MARKO)

    33

    2011/C 145/55

    Case T-166/11: Action brought on 17 March 2011 — Häfele v OHIM (Infront)

    33

    2011/C 145/56

    Case T-167/11: Action brought on 15 March 2011 — Centre national de la recherche scientifique v Commission

    34

    2011/C 145/57

    Case T-170/11: Action brought on 17 March 2011 — Rivella International v OHIM — Baskaya di Baskaya & C. (BASKAYA)

    34

    2011/C 145/58

    Case T-171/11: Action brought on 21 March 2011 — Hopf v OHIM (Clampflex)

    35

    2011/C 145/59

    Case T-173/11: Action brought on 22 March 2011 — Hesse v OHIM — Porsche (Carrera)

    35

    2011/C 145/60

    Case T-177/11: Action brought on 25 March 2011 — PASP and Others v Council

    36

    2011/C 145/61

    Case T-178/11: Action brought on 18 March 2011 — Voss of Norway v OHIM — Nordic Spirit (Three-dimensional ‘bottle’)

    36

    2011/C 145/62

    Case T-183/11: Action brought on 28 March 2011 — MIP Metro v OHIM — Jacinto (My Little Bear)

    37

    2011/C 145/63

    Case T-186/11: Action brought on 26 March 2011 — Schönberger v Parliament

    37

    2011/C 145/64

    Case T-188/11: Action brought on 1 April 2011 — Chiboub v Council

    38


    EN

     

    Top