EUR-Lex Access to European Union law
This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62018TN0230
Case T-230/18: Action brought on 6 April 2018 — Czarnecki v Parliament
Case T-230/18: Action brought on 6 April 2018 — Czarnecki v Parliament
Case T-230/18: Action brought on 6 April 2018 — Czarnecki v Parliament
OJ C 231, 2.7.2018, p. 27–28
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
Case T-230/18: Action brought on 6 April 2018 — Czarnecki v Parliament
Action brought on 6 April 2018 — Czarnecki v Parliament
(Case T-230/18)
2018/C 231/34Language of the case: FrenchParties
Applicant: Ryszard Czarnecki (Warsaw, Poland) (represented by: M. Casado García-Hirschfeld, lawyer)
Defendant: European Parliament
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
|
— |
declare the present action admissible; |
|
— |
annul the contested decision of the European Parliament of 7 February 2018; |
|
— |
order the defendant to pay all the costs. |
Pleas in law and main arguments
In support of the action, the applicant relies on three pleas in law.
|
1. |
First plea in law, alleging, first, infringement of the principle of the presumption of innocence, the right of defence and the principle of equality of arms, and, secondly, infringement of the principle of sound administration, the principle of the proportionality and the right to freedom of expression. |
|
2. |
Second plea in law, alleging a manifest error of assessment, a fumus persecutionis and misuse of powers. |
|
3. |
Third plea in law, alleging infringement of the principle of legal certainty and the principle of protection of legitimate expectations. |