This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62018TA0667
Case T-667/18: Order of the General Court of 28 November 2019 — Pinto Teixeira v EEAS (Civil service — Rights and obligations of officials — Declaration of intention to engage in an occupational activity after leaving the service — Article 16 of the Staff Regulations — Risk of incompatibility with the legitimate interests of the institution — Deadline for responding to the declaration of intention — Implicit acceptance — Prohibition on engaging in an occupational activity after leaving the service — Non-material damage)
Case T-667/18: Order of the General Court of 28 November 2019 — Pinto Teixeira v EEAS (Civil service — Rights and obligations of officials — Declaration of intention to engage in an occupational activity after leaving the service — Article 16 of the Staff Regulations — Risk of incompatibility with the legitimate interests of the institution — Deadline for responding to the declaration of intention — Implicit acceptance — Prohibition on engaging in an occupational activity after leaving the service — Non-material damage)
Case T-667/18: Order of the General Court of 28 November 2019 — Pinto Teixeira v EEAS (Civil service — Rights and obligations of officials — Declaration of intention to engage in an occupational activity after leaving the service — Article 16 of the Staff Regulations — Risk of incompatibility with the legitimate interests of the institution — Deadline for responding to the declaration of intention — Implicit acceptance — Prohibition on engaging in an occupational activity after leaving the service — Non-material damage)
IO C 36, 3.2.2020, pp. 27–28
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
3.2.2020 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 36/27 |
Order of the General Court of 28 November 2019 — Pinto Teixeira v EEAS
(Case T-667/18) ( (1))
(Civil service - Rights and obligations of officials - Declaration of intention to engage in an occupational activity after leaving the service - Article 16 of the Staff Regulations - Risk of incompatibility with the legitimate interests of the institution - Deadline for responding to the declaration of intention - Implicit acceptance - Prohibition on engaging in an occupational activity after leaving the service - Non-material damage)
(2020/C 36/33)
Language of the case: French
Parties
Applicant: José Manuel Pinto Teixeira (Oeiras, Portugal) (represented by: S. Orlandi and T. Martin, lawyers)
Defendant: European External Action Service (represented by: S. Marquardt and R. Spac, acting as Agents)
Re:
Action based on Article 270 TFEU seeking, first, annulment of the decision of the EEAS of 21 February 2018 prohibiting the applicant from engaging in an outside activity pursuant to Article 16 of the Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union and, secondly, compensation for the damage that the applicant claims to have suffered as a result of that decision.
Operative part
|
1) |
The decision of the European External Action Service (EEAS) of 21 February 2018 prohibiting Mr José Manuel Pinto Teixeira from engaging in an outside activity, pursuant to Article 16 of the Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union, is annulled. |
|
2) |
The action is dismissed as to the remainder. |
|
3) |
Each party shall pay its own costs. |