EUR-Lex Access to European Union law
This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62017CB0325
Case C-325/17 P: Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 26 June 2018 — Windrush Aka LLP v European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO), Jerry Dammers (Appeal — Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — EU trade mark — Revocation proceedings — Word mark The Specials — Genuine use — Consent of the proprietor of the trade mark)
Case C-325/17 P: Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 26 June 2018 — Windrush Aka LLP v European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO), Jerry Dammers (Appeal — Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — EU trade mark — Revocation proceedings — Word mark The Specials — Genuine use — Consent of the proprietor of the trade mark)
Case C-325/17 P: Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 26 June 2018 — Windrush Aka LLP v European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO), Jerry Dammers (Appeal — Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — EU trade mark — Revocation proceedings — Word mark The Specials — Genuine use — Consent of the proprietor of the trade mark)
OJ C 301, 27.8.2018, p. 11–11
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
27.8.2018 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 301/11 |
Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 26 June 2018 — Windrush Aka LLP v European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO), Jerry Dammers
(Case C-325/17 P) (1)
((Appeal - Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice - EU trade mark - Revocation proceedings - Word mark The Specials - Genuine use - Consent of the proprietor of the trade mark))
(2018/C 301/13)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Appellant: Windrush Aka LLP (represented by: S. Malynicz, QC, instructed by S. Britton, Solicitor)
Other parties to the proceedings: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) (represented by: D. Botis and J. Crespo Carrillo, acting as Agents), Jerry Dammers (represented by: B. Brandreth, Barrister, instructed by C. Fehler, Solicitor)
Operative part of the order
|
1. |
The appeal is dismissed as being manifestly unfounded. |
|
2. |
Windrush Aka LLP shall pay the costs. |