EUR-Lex Access to European Union law

Back to EUR-Lex homepage

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62017CA0073

Case C-73/17: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 2 October 2018 — French Republic v European Parliament (Action for annulment — Institutional law — Protocol on the location of the seats of the institutions and of certain bodies, offices, agencies and departments of the European Union — European Parliament — Concept of ‘budget session’ held in Strasbourg (France) — Article 314 TFEU — Exercise of budgetary powers during an additional plenary part-session in Brussels (Belgium))

OJ C 436, 3.12.2018, p. 8–9 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

3.12.2018   

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 436/8


Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 2 October 2018 — French Republic v European Parliament

(Case C-73/17) (1)

((Action for annulment - Institutional law - Protocol on the location of the seats of the institutions and of certain bodies, offices, agencies and departments of the European Union - European Parliament - Concept of ‘budget session’ held in Strasbourg (France) - Article 314 TFEU - Exercise of budgetary powers during an additional plenary part-session in Brussels (Belgium)))

(2018/C 436/08)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: French Republic (represented by: F. Alabrune, D. Colas, B. Fodda and E. de Moustier, acting as Agents)

Defendant: European Parliament (represented by: R. Crowe and U. Rösslein, acting as Agents)

Intervener in support of the applicant: Grand Duchy of Luxembourg (represented by: D. Holderer and C. Schiltz, acting as Agents)

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

1.

Dismisses the action;

2.

Orders the French Republic to pay, in addition to its own costs, those of the European Parliament;

3.

Orders the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg to bear its own costs.


(1)  OJ C 104, 3.4.2017.


Top