EUR-Lex Access to European Union law
This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62016CN0529
Case C-529/16: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Finanzgericht München (Germany) lodged on 17 October 2016 — Hamamatsu Photonics Deutschland GmbH v Hauptzollamt München
Case C-529/16: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Finanzgericht München (Germany) lodged on 17 October 2016 — Hamamatsu Photonics Deutschland GmbH v Hauptzollamt München
Case C-529/16: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Finanzgericht München (Germany) lodged on 17 October 2016 — Hamamatsu Photonics Deutschland GmbH v Hauptzollamt München
OJ C 30, 30.1.2017, p. 17–17
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
30.1.2017 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 30/17 |
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Finanzgericht München (Germany) lodged on 17 October 2016 — Hamamatsu Photonics Deutschland GmbH v Hauptzollamt München
(Case C-529/16)
(2017/C 030/19)
Language of the case: German
Referring court
Finanzgericht München
Parties to the main proceedings
Applicant: Hamamatsu Photonics Deutschland GmbH
Defendant: Hauptzollamt München
Questions referred
1. |
Do the provisions of Article 28 et seq. of Council Regulation (EEC) No 2913/92 of 12 October 1992 establishing the Community Customs Code, (1) as amended by Regulation (EC) No 2700/2000 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 November 2000, (2) permit an agreed transfer price, which is composed of an amount initially invoiced and declared and a flat-rate adjustment made after the end of the accounting period, to form the basis for the customs value, using an allocation key, regardless of whether a subsequent debit charge or credit is made to the declarant at the end of the accounting period? |
2. |
If so: May the customs value be reviewed and/or determined using simplified approaches where the effects of subsequent transfer pricing adjustments (both upward and downward) can be recognised? |