EUR-Lex Access to European Union law
This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62014TN0589
Case T-589/14: Action brought on 8 August 2014 — Musso v Parliament
Case T-589/14: Action brought on 8 August 2014 — Musso v Parliament
Case T-589/14: Action brought on 8 August 2014 — Musso v Parliament
OJ C 351, 6.10.2014, p. 22–23
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
6.10.2014 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 351/22 |
Action brought on 8 August 2014 — Musso v Parliament
(Case T-589/14)
2014/C 351/28
Language of the case: French
Parties
Applicant: François Musso (Ajaccio, France) (represented by: A. Gross, lawyer)
Defendant: European Parliament
Form of order sought
— |
Admit the present action and declare it well founded; |
— |
Annul the decision of 26 June 2014:
|
— |
Reserve to the applicant all other rights, entitlements, pleas and actions to be claimed; |
— |
Order the defendant to pay all the costs of the instance. |
Pleas in law and main arguments
In support of the action, the applicant relies on six pleas in law.
1. |
First plea in law, alleging a formal irregularity in the contested decision of 26 June 2014, since it was not signed by the President of the Parliament in accordance with the internal rules of the European Parliament. |
2. |
Second plea in law, alleging infringement of the rights of the defence of the applicant, since the decision of 17 July 1996 which served as the basis for the contested decision of 26 June 2014 was not published, in breach of Article 28 of the Rules of Procedure. |
3. |
Third plea in law, alleging infringement of the adversarial principle. |
4. |
Fourth plea in law, alleging an insufficient statement of reasons of the contested decision. |
5. |
Fifth plea in law, alleging infringement of the reasonable time principle, since the Parliament waited eight years before beginning the recovery proceedings against the applicant. |
6. |
Sixth plea in law, alleging infringement of the principle of acquired right, since the contested decision calls into question the pension rights which the applicant acquired on 3 August 1994. |