Back to EUR-Lex homepage

EUR-Lex Access to European Union law

Back to EUR-Lex homepage

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Use quotation marks to search for an "exact phrase". Append an asterisk (*) to a search term to find variations of it (transp*, 32019R*). Use a question mark (?) instead of a single character in your search term to find variations of it (ca?e finds case, cane, care).
Search tips
Need more search options? Use the Advanced search
You are here

Document 62014TN0381

Case T-381/14: Action brought on 30 May 2014 — Pshonka v Council

OJ C 261, 11.8.2014, p. 38–38 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

11.8.2014   

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 261/38

Action brought on 30 May 2014 — Pshonka v Council

(Case T-381/14)

2014/C 261/63

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Viktor Pavlovych Pshonka (Moscow, Russia) (represented by: C. Constantina and J.-M. Reymond, lawyers)

Defendant: Council of the European Union

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

—

partially annul, on the basis of Article 263 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU), Council Decision 2014/119/CFSP of 5 March 2014 and Council Regulation No 208/2014 of 5 March 2014, insofar as they concern the applicant and, more specifically, order:

—

to remove the applicant’s name from Annex I of the Council Regulation N. 208/2014 of 5 March 2014;

—

to remove the applicant’s name from Annex I of the Council Decision 2014/119/CFSP of 5 March 2014;

—

partially annul, on the basis of Article 263 TFEU, Council Decision 2014/119/CFSP of 5 March 2014 and Council Regulation No 208/2014 of 5 March 2014, insofar as they do not conform to the Joint Proposal;

—

order the Council to bear the costs of this suit and award costs to the applicant.

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on three pleas in law which are essentially identical or similar to those relied on in Case T-380/14, Pshonka v Council.

Top