EUR-Lex Access to European Union law
This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62013CB0521
Case C-521/13 P: Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 11 September 2014 — Think Schuhwerk GmbH v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (Appeal — Community trade mark — Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 — Article 7(1)(b) — No distinctive character — Red aglets on shoe laces — Article 122 of the Rules of Procedure of the General Court — Appeal in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly unfounded)
Case C-521/13 P: Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 11 September 2014 — Think Schuhwerk GmbH v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (Appeal — Community trade mark — Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 — Article 7(1)(b) — No distinctive character — Red aglets on shoe laces — Article 122 of the Rules of Procedure of the General Court — Appeal in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly unfounded)
Case C-521/13 P: Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 11 September 2014 — Think Schuhwerk GmbH v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (Appeal — Community trade mark — Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 — Article 7(1)(b) — No distinctive character — Red aglets on shoe laces — Article 122 of the Rules of Procedure of the General Court — Appeal in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly unfounded)
OJ C 431, 1.12.2014, p. 6–6
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
1.12.2014 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 431/6 |
Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 11 September 2014 — Think Schuhwerk GmbH v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)
(Case C-521/13 P) (1)
((Appeal - Community trade mark - Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 - Article 7(1)(b) - No distinctive character - Red aglets on shoe laces - Article 122 of the Rules of Procedure of the General Court - Appeal in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly unfounded))
(2014/C 431/10)
Language of the case: German
Parties
Appellant: Think Schuhwerk GmbH (represented by: M. Gail, Rechtsanwalt)
Other party to the proceedings: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: G. Schneider, Agent)
Operative part of the order
1. |
The appeal is dismissed. |
2. |
Think Schuhwerk GmbH is ordered to pay the costs. |