Accept Refuse

EUR-Lex Access to European Union law

Back to EUR-Lex homepage

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62010TA0271

Case T-271/10 RENV: Judgment of the General Court of 11 April 2018 — H v Council (Common foreign and security policy — National staff member seconded to EUPM in Bosnia and Herzegovina — Redeployment decision — Power of the Head of the EUPM to decide on the redeployment of a seconded national staff member — Obligation to state reasons — Misuse of powers — Manifest error of assessment — Psychological harassment)

OJ C 182, 28.5.2018, p. 20–20 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

28.5.2018   

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 182/20


Judgment of the General Court of 11 April 2018 — H v Council

(Case T-271/10 RENV) (1)

((Common foreign and security policy - National staff member seconded to EUPM in Bosnia and Herzegovina - Redeployment decision - Power of the Head of the EUPM to decide on the redeployment of a seconded national staff member - Obligation to state reasons - Misuse of powers - Manifest error of assessment - Psychological harassment))

(2018/C 182/22)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: H (represented by: M. Velardo, lawyer)

Defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: A. Vitro and F. Naert, acting as Agents)

Re:

In the first place, application based on Article 263 TFEU for annulment of (i) the decision of 7 April 2010, signed by the Chief of Personnel of the European Union Police Mission (EUPM) in Bosnia and Herzegovina, by which the applicant was redeployed to the post of Criminal Justice Advisor — Prosecutor at the regional office in Banja Luka (Bosnia and Herzegovina) and (ii) of the decision of 30 April 2010, signed by the Head of EUPM referred to in Article 6 of Council Decision 2009/906/CFSP of 8 December 2009 on the EUPM in Bosnia and Herzegovina (OJ 2009 L 322, p. 22), confirming the decision of 7 April 2010, and in the second place, action on the basis of Article 268 TFEU seeking compensation for the harm allegedly suffered by the applicant.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

1.

Dismisses the action;

2.

Orders H to pay the costs.


(1)  OJ C 221, 14.8.2010.


Top