Back to EUR-Lex homepage

EUR-Lex Access to European Union law

Back to EUR-Lex homepage

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Use quotation marks to search for an "exact phrase". Append an asterisk (*) to a search term to find variations of it (transp*, 32019R*). Use a question mark (?) instead of a single character in your search term to find variations of it (ca?e finds case, cane, care).
Search tips
Need more search options? Use the Advanced search
You are here

Document 52009XX0627(03)

Opinion of the Advisory Committee on restrictive practices and dominant positions given at its 382nd meeting on 18 October 2004 concerning a preliminary draft decision in Case COMP/F-1/38.338 — PO/Needles

OJ C 147, 27.6.2009, p. 19–19 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

27.6.2009   

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 147/19

Opinion of the Advisory Committee on restrictive practices and dominant positions given at its 382nd meeting on 18 October 2004 concerning a preliminary draft decision in Case COMP/F-1/38.338 — PO/Needles

2009/C 147/12

1.

The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission’s conclusion on the relevant markets.

2.

The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission that the addressees of the draft decision have participated in agreements and/or concerted practices within the meaning of Article 81(1) of the EC Treaty.

3.

The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission that the object and effect of the agreements and/or concerted practices were to restrict competition within the meaning of Article 81(1) of the EC Treaty.

4.

The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission that the addressees of the draft decision have participated in a single and continuous infringement of Article 81(1) of the EC Treaty.

5.

The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission that the agreements and/or concerted practices have been capable of appreciably affecting trade between Member States of the EU.

6.

The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission on its assessment of Article 81(3) of the EC Treaty.

7.

The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission that Article 7 of Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 should be applied in this case.

8.

The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission on the gravity and duration of the infringement.

9.

The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission that there are no mitigating or aggravating circumstances applicable.

10.

The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission on the application of the Leniency Notice.

11.

The Advisory Committee recommends the publication of its opinion in the Official Journal of the European Union.

12.

The Advisory Committee asks the Commission to take into account all the other points raised during the discussion.
Top