This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document C2007/269/82
Case T-461/04: Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 20 September 2007 — Imagination Technologies v OHIM (PURE DIGITAL) (Community trade mark — Application for the Community word mark PURE DIGITAL — Absolute grounds for refusal — Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 — Distinctive character acquired through use — Article 7(3) of Regulation No 40/94)
Case T-461/04: Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 20 September 2007 — Imagination Technologies v OHIM (PURE DIGITAL) (Community trade mark — Application for the Community word mark PURE DIGITAL — Absolute grounds for refusal — Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 — Distinctive character acquired through use — Article 7(3) of Regulation No 40/94)
Case T-461/04: Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 20 September 2007 — Imagination Technologies v OHIM (PURE DIGITAL) (Community trade mark — Application for the Community word mark PURE DIGITAL — Absolute grounds for refusal — Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 — Distinctive character acquired through use — Article 7(3) of Regulation No 40/94)
IO C 269, 10.11.2007, p. 46–47
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
10.11.2007 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 269/46 |
Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 20 September 2007 — Imagination Technologies v OHIM (PURE DIGITAL)
(Case T-461/04) (1)
(Community trade mark - Application for the Community word mark PURE DIGITAL - Absolute grounds for refusal - Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 - Distinctive character acquired through use - Article 7(3) of Regulation No 40/94)
(2007/C 269/82)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: Imagination Technologies (Kings Langley, Hertfordshire, United Kingdom) (represented by: M. Edenborough, Barrister, and P. Brownlow and N. Jenkins, Solicitors)
Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: D. Schennen initially and subsequently by D. Botis, acting as Agents)
Re:
Application for annulment of the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 16 September 2004 (Case R 108/2004-2), concerning an application for the registration of the word mark PURE DIGITAL as a Community trade mark
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
|
1. |
Dismisses the action; |
|
2. |
Orders the applicant to pay the costs. |