Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document C2006/249/04

    Case C-302/06: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Krajský sud v Prešove (Slovakia) lodged on 7 July 2006 — František Kovaľský v Mesto Prešov and Dopravný podnik Mesta Prešov as

    IO C 249, 14.10.2006, p. 2–2 (ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, NL, PL, PT, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    14.10.2006   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    C 249/2


    Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Krajský sud v Prešove (Slovakia) lodged on 7 July 2006 — František Kovaľský v Mesto Prešov and Dopravný podnik Mesta Prešov as

    (Case C-302/06)

    (2006/C 249/04)

    Language of the case: Slovak

    Referring court

    Krajský sud v Prešove (Slovakia)

    Parties to the main proceedings

    Applicant: František Kovaľský

    Defendants: Mesto Prešov and Dopravný podnik Mesta Prešov as

    Questions referred

    1.

    Must the second paragraph of Article 1 of the Protocol to the Convention on the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, in connection with the possibility for States to enact laws to control the use of property, be interpreted as meaning that those laws must satisfy the condition of being in accordance not only with the general interest but also with the general principles of international law?

    2.

    Does Article 1 of the Protocol to the Convention on the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms protect the property of natural and legal persons without regard to the value of the property?

    3.

    How may the general principles of international law be defined and specified for the purposes of the application of Article 1 of the Protocol to the Convention on the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms?


    Top