EUR-Lex Access to European Union law
This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document C2006/074/32
Case T-276/03: Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 25 January 2006 — Le Canne v Commission (Judgment annulling a Commission decision reducing the amount of Community financial assistance — Procedures for compliance — Action for failure to act — No need to adjudicate — Action for compensation)
Case T-276/03: Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 25 January 2006 — Le Canne v Commission (Judgment annulling a Commission decision reducing the amount of Community financial assistance — Procedures for compliance — Action for failure to act — No need to adjudicate — Action for compensation)
Case T-276/03: Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 25 January 2006 — Le Canne v Commission (Judgment annulling a Commission decision reducing the amount of Community financial assistance — Procedures for compliance — Action for failure to act — No need to adjudicate — Action for compensation)
IO C 74, 25.3.2006, p. 16–16
(ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, NL, PL, PT, SK, SL, FI, SV)
25.3.2006 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 74/16 |
Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 25 January 2006 — Le Canne v Commission
(Case T-276/03) (1)
(Judgment annulling a Commission decision reducing the amount of Community financial assistance - Procedures for compliance - Action for failure to act - No need to adjudicate - Action for compensation)
(2006/C 74/32)
Language of the case: Italian
Parties
Applicant: Azienda agricola ‘Le Canne’ (Porto Viro, Italy) (represented by: F. Mazzonetto and G. Carraro, lawyers)
Defendant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: L. Visaggio and C. Cattabriga, Agents, assisted by A. Dal Ferro, lawyer)
Application for
First, a declaration that the Commission unlawfully failed to adopt the measures to comply with the judgment of the Court of First Instance of 5 March 2002 in Case T-241/00 Le Canne v Commission [2002] ECR II-1251 and, second, compensation for the loss alleged to have resulted from that failure
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
1. |
Declares that there is no need to adjudicate on the claim alleging failure to act; |
2. |
Dismisses the claim for compensation; |
3. |
Orders the parties to bear their own costs. |