This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document C2005/281/36
Case T-130/03: Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 22 September 2005 — Alcon v OHIM (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Earlier national word mark TRIVASTAN — Application for Community word mark TRAVATAN — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94)
Case T-130/03: Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 22 September 2005 — Alcon v OHIM (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Earlier national word mark TRIVASTAN — Application for Community word mark TRAVATAN — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94)
Case T-130/03: Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 22 September 2005 — Alcon v OHIM (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Earlier national word mark TRIVASTAN — Application for Community word mark TRAVATAN — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94)
IO C 281, 12.11.2005, p. 20–20
(ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, NL, PL, PT, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
12.11.2005 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 281/20 |
Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 22 September 2005 — Alcon v OHIM
(Case T-130/03) (1)
(Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Earlier national word mark TRIVASTAN - Application for Community word mark TRAVATAN - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94)
(2005/C 281/36)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant(s): Alcon Inc. (Hünenberg, Switzerland) (represented by: G. Breen, Solicitor, and J. Gleeson, Barrister)
Defendant(s): Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: S. Palmero Cabezas and S. Laitinen, Agents)
Other party or parties to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervening before the Court of First Instance : Biofarma SA, (Neuilly-sur-Seine, France) (represented by: V. Gil Vega, A. Ruiz Lopez, and D. González Maroto, lawyer)
Application for
annulment of the decision of the Third Board of Appeal of OHIM of 30 January 2003 (Case R 968/2001-3) concerning opposition proceedings between Alcon Inc. and Biofarma SA
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
|
1. |
Dismisses the action; |
|
2. |
Orders the applicant to pay the costs. |