Access to European Union law
<a href="https://eur-lex.europa.eu/content/help/eurlex-content/experimental-features.html" target="_blank">More about the experimental features corner</a>
Choose the experimental features you want to try
EUR-Lex
Access to European Union law

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

You are here
Use quotation marks to search for an "exact phrase". Append an asterisk (*) to a search term to find variations of it (transp*, 32019R*). Use a question mark (?) instead of a single character in your search term to find variations of it (ca?e finds case, cane, care).
Search tips
Need more search options? Use the Advanced search

Document C2005/205/51

    Case T-226/05: Action brought on 14 June 2005 by Dimitra Lantzoni against the Court of Justice of the European Communities

    IO C 205, 20.8.2005, p. 28–29 (ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, NL, PL, PT, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    20.8.2005   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    C 205/28

    Action brought on 14 June 2005 by Dimitra Lantzoni against the Court of Justice of the European Communities

    (Case T-226/05)

    (2005/C 205/51)

    Language of the case: French

    An action against the Court of Justice of the European Communities was brought before the Court of First Instance of the European Communities on 14 June 2005 by Dimitra Lantzoni, residing in Luxembourg, represented by Michèle Bouché, lawyer.

    The applicant claims that the Court should:

    —

    order the Court of Justice to pay EUR 50 000 as compensation for the non-material loss suffered by the applicant as a result of serious irregularities that have led to the blocking of her career;

    —

    order the defendant to pay the costs.

    Pleas in law and main arguments

    On 3 June 2004 the applicant, an official of the Court of Justice, lodged a claim for compensation for the material and non-material loss that she alleges she has suffered as a result of the blocking of her career since the new promotion system was introduced in 2000. Both that claim and her complaint having been rejected, the applicant has brought this action. In support of her heads of claim, she argues that the alleged blocking of her career, and also the material and non-material loss that she has allegedly suffered, are due to serious and repeated irregularities and failures to act on the part of the Court's administration, as regards both her staff reports and the number of promotion points awarded on that basis.

    Top