This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document C2005/093/04
Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 24 February 2005 in Case C-320/04 Commission of the European Communities v Grand Duchy of Luxembourg (Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Directive 2000/43/EC — Failure to transpose within the prescribed period)
Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 24 February 2005 in Case C-320/04 Commission of the European Communities v Grand Duchy of Luxembourg (Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Directive 2000/43/EC — Failure to transpose within the prescribed period)
Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 24 February 2005 in Case C-320/04 Commission of the European Communities v Grand Duchy of Luxembourg (Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Directive 2000/43/EC — Failure to transpose within the prescribed period)
IO C 93, 16.4.2005, p. 2–3
(ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, NL, PL, PT, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
16.4.2005 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 93/2 |
JUDGMENT OF THE COURT
(Fifth Chamber)
of 24 February 2005
in Case C-320/04 Commission of the European Communities v Grand Duchy of Luxembourg (1)
(Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations - Directive 2000/43/EC - Failure to transpose within the prescribed period)
(2005/C 93/04)
Language of the case: French
In Case C-320/04 Commission of the European Communities (Agent: D. Martin) v Grand Duchy of Luxembourg (Agent: S. Schreiner) – action for failure to fulfil obligations under Article 226 EC, brought on 27 July 2004 – the Court (Fifth Chamber), composed of R. Silva de Lapuerta, President of the Chamber, J. Makarczyk and J. Klučka (Rapporteur), Judges; P. Léger, Advocate General; R. Grass, Registrar, gave a judgment on 24 February 2005, in which it:
|
1. |
Declares that by failing to adopt the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Council Directive 2000/43/EC of 29 June 2000 implementing the principle of equal treatment between persons irrespective of racial or ethnic origin, the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive; |
|
2. |
Orders the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg to pay the costs. |