Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document C2004/251/30

    Order of the Court of First Instance of 2 July 2004 in Case T-256/03: Bundesverband der Nahrungsmittel- und Speiseresteverwertung eV and Josef Kloh v Commission of the European Communities (Action for annulment — Regulation (EC) No 1774/2002 — Decision 2003/328/EC — Use of catering waste in feed for pigs — Inadmissible)

    IO C 251, 9.10.2004, p. 16–16 (ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, NL, PL, PT, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    9.10.2004   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    C 251/16


    ORDER OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

    of 2 July 2004

    in Case T-256/03: Bundesverband der Nahrungsmittel- und Speiseresteverwertung eV and Josef Kloh v Commission of the European Communities (1)

    (Action for annulment - Regulation (EC) No 1774/2002 - Decision 2003/328/EC - Use of catering waste in feed for pigs - Inadmissible)

    (2004/C 251/30)

    Language of the case: German

    In Case T-256/03: Bundesverband der Nahrungsmittel- und Speiseresteverwertung eV, established in Bochum (Germany), Josef Kloh, residing in Eichenried (Germany), represented by R. Steiling and S. von Zimmermann-Wienhues, lawyers, v Commission of the European Communities (Agent: G. Braun), with an address for service in Luxembourg — action for the partial annulment of Decision 2003/328/EC of 12 May 2003 on transitional measures under Regulation (EC) No 1774/2002 of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards the use of category 3 catering waste in feed for pigs and the intra-species recycling ban on the feeding of swill to pigs (OJ 2003 L 117, p. 46) — the Court of First Instance (Second Chamber), composed of J. Pirrung, President, A. W. H. Meij and N. J. Forwood, Judges; H. Jung, Registrar, made an order on 2 July 2004, the operative part of which is as follows:

    (1)

    The action is dismissed as inadmissible.

    (2)

    The applicants are ordered to bear their own costs and those incurred by the Commission.


    (1)  OJ No C 213 of 6.9.2003.


    Top