This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document C2004/118/08
Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 29 April 2004 in Case C-298/00 P: Italian Republic v Commission of the European Communities and Impresa Edo Collorigh and Others (Appeal — State aid — Transport of goods by road — Effect on trade between Member States and distortion of competition — Existing aid or new aid — Principles of reasonableness and of the protection of legitimate expectations — Statement of reasons)
Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 29 April 2004 in Case C-298/00 P: Italian Republic v Commission of the European Communities and Impresa Edo Collorigh and Others (Appeal — State aid — Transport of goods by road — Effect on trade between Member States and distortion of competition — Existing aid or new aid — Principles of reasonableness and of the protection of legitimate expectations — Statement of reasons)
Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 29 April 2004 in Case C-298/00 P: Italian Republic v Commission of the European Communities and Impresa Edo Collorigh and Others (Appeal — State aid — Transport of goods by road — Effect on trade between Member States and distortion of competition — Existing aid or new aid — Principles of reasonableness and of the protection of legitimate expectations — Statement of reasons)
IO C 118, 30.4.2004, p. 4–4
(ES, DA, DE, EL, EN, FR, IT, NL, PT, FI, SV)
|
30.4.2004 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 118/4 |
JUDGMENT OF THE COURT
(Sixth Chamber)
of 29 April 2004
in Case C-298/00 P: Italian Republic v Commission of the European Communities and Impresa Edo Collorigh and Others (1)
(Appeal - State aid - Transport of goods by road - Effect on trade between Member States and distortion of competition - Existing aid or new aid - Principles of reasonableness and of the protection of legitimate expectations - Statement of reasons)
(2004/C 118/08)
Language of the case: Italian
In Case C-298/00 P: Italian Republic (Agents: I. Braguglia, assisted by G. Aiello), with an address for service in Luxembourg — appeal against the judgment of the Court of First Instance of the European Communities (Fourth Chamber, Extended Composition) in Joined Cases T-298/97, T-312/97, T-313/97, T-315/97, T-600/97 to T-607/97, T-1/98, T-3/98 to T-6/98 and T-23/98 Alzetta and Others v Commission [2000] ECR II-2319, seeking to have that judgment set aside, the other parties to the proceedings being: Commission of the European Communities (Agent: V. Di Bucci), with an address for service in Luxembourg, Impresa Edo Collorigh and Others (Lawyer: V. Cinque), Mauro Alzetta and Others, Masotti Srl and Others, Impresa Anna Maria Baldo and Others, SUTES SpA and Others, Ditta Pietro Stagno and Others, Ditta Carlo Fabris & C. Snc, Ditta Franco D'Odorico, Ditta Fiorindo Birri, Ditta Maria Cecilia Framalicco, Autotrasporti Claudio Di Viola & C. Snc and Impresa Amedeo Musso — the Court (Sixth Chamber), composed of: V. Skouris acting for the President of the Sixth Chamber, J. N. Cunha Rodrigues, J.-P. Puissochet, R. Schintgen and F. Macken (Rapporteur), Judges; S. Alber, Advocate General; M.-F. Contet, Principal Administrator, for the Registrar, has given a judgment on 29 April 2004, in which it:
|
1. |
Dismissed the appeal and the interlocutory appeal. |
|
2. |
Ordered the Italian Republic, Impresa Edo Collorigh and Others and the Commission of the European Communities to pay their own costs. |