This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62020TN0071
Case T-71/20: Action brought on 6 February 2020 — Puma v EUIPO — CAMäleon (PUMA-System)
Case T-71/20: Action brought on 6 February 2020 — Puma v EUIPO — CAMäleon (PUMA-System)
Case T-71/20: Action brought on 6 February 2020 — Puma v EUIPO — CAMäleon (PUMA-System)
IO C 114, 6.4.2020, pp. 12–13
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
6.4.2020 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 114/12 |
Action brought on 6 February 2020 — Puma v EUIPO — CAMäleon (PUMA-System)
(Case T-71/20)
(2020/C 114/12)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: Puma SE (Herzogenaurach, Germany) (represented by: P. GonzálezBueno Catalán de Ocón, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: CAMäleon Produktionsautomatisierung GmbH (Dettenhausen, Germany)
Details of the proceedings before EUIPO
Applicant of the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal
Trade mark at issue: Application for European Union word mark PUMA-System — Application for registration No 16 786 907
Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings
Contested decision: Decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 27 November 2019 in Case R 404/2019-1
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
|
— |
annul the contested decision; |
|
— |
order EUIPO to pay the costs of the proceedings. |
Pleas in law
|
— |
Breach of the principle of sound administration; |
|
— |
Infringement of Article 8(1)(b), Article 94 and Article 95(1) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council; |
|
— |
Infringement of Article 8(5) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council. |