This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62020TA0581
Case T-581/20: Judgment of the General Court of 24 November 2021 — YP v Commission (Civil service — Officials — Promotion — 2019 promotion exercise — Decision not to promote — Article 45 of the Staff Regulations — Comparison of merits — Use of languages in the context of duties performed by officials assigned to linguistic duties and by officials assigned to duties other than linguistic — Seniority in grade — Presumption of innocence — Article 9 of Annex IX to the Staff Regulations — Duty to state reasons — Compliance with a settlement agreement)
Case T-581/20: Judgment of the General Court of 24 November 2021 — YP v Commission (Civil service — Officials — Promotion — 2019 promotion exercise — Decision not to promote — Article 45 of the Staff Regulations — Comparison of merits — Use of languages in the context of duties performed by officials assigned to linguistic duties and by officials assigned to duties other than linguistic — Seniority in grade — Presumption of innocence — Article 9 of Annex IX to the Staff Regulations — Duty to state reasons — Compliance with a settlement agreement)
Case T-581/20: Judgment of the General Court of 24 November 2021 — YP v Commission (Civil service — Officials — Promotion — 2019 promotion exercise — Decision not to promote — Article 45 of the Staff Regulations — Comparison of merits — Use of languages in the context of duties performed by officials assigned to linguistic duties and by officials assigned to duties other than linguistic — Seniority in grade — Presumption of innocence — Article 9 of Annex IX to the Staff Regulations — Duty to state reasons — Compliance with a settlement agreement)
IO C 37, 24.1.2022, p. 30–31
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
24.1.2022 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 37/30 |
Judgment of the General Court of 24 November 2021 — YP v Commission
(Case T-581/20) (1)
(Civil service - Officials - Promotion - 2019 promotion exercise - Decision not to promote - Article 45 of the Staff Regulations - Comparison of merits - Use of languages in the context of duties performed by officials assigned to linguistic duties and by officials assigned to duties other than linguistic - Seniority in grade - Presumption of innocence - Article 9 of Annex IX to the Staff Regulations - Duty to state reasons - Compliance with a settlement agreement)
(2022/C 37/41)
Language of the case: French
Parties
Applicant: YP (represented by: J. Van Rossum and J.-N. Louis, lawyers)
Defendant: European Commission (represented by: M. Brauhoff, L. Radu Bouyon and L. Hohenecker, acting as Agents)
Re:
Application under Article 270 TFEU seeking annulment of the Commission’s decision of 14 November 2019 not to include the applicant’s name in the list of officials promoted in the 2019 promotion exercise.
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
|
1. |
Dismisses the action; |
|
2. |
Orders YP to pay the costs. |