This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62019TB0066
Case T-66/19: Order of the General Court of 10 December 2019 — Vlaamse Gemeenschap and Vlaamse Gewest v Parliament and Council (Action for annulment — Internal market — Fundamental freedoms — Regulation (EU) 2018/1724 — Establishment of a single digital gateway to provide access to information, to procedures and to assistance and problem-solving services — Sub-national authority — Standing to bring proceedings — Individual concern — Inadmissibility)
Case T-66/19: Order of the General Court of 10 December 2019 — Vlaamse Gemeenschap and Vlaamse Gewest v Parliament and Council (Action for annulment — Internal market — Fundamental freedoms — Regulation (EU) 2018/1724 — Establishment of a single digital gateway to provide access to information, to procedures and to assistance and problem-solving services — Sub-national authority — Standing to bring proceedings — Individual concern — Inadmissibility)
Case T-66/19: Order of the General Court of 10 December 2019 — Vlaamse Gemeenschap and Vlaamse Gewest v Parliament and Council (Action for annulment — Internal market — Fundamental freedoms — Regulation (EU) 2018/1724 — Establishment of a single digital gateway to provide access to information, to procedures and to assistance and problem-solving services — Sub-national authority — Standing to bring proceedings — Individual concern — Inadmissibility)
IO C 61, 24.2.2020, p. 40–41
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
24.2.2020 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 61/40 |
Order of the General Court of 10 December 2019 — Vlaamse Gemeenschap and Vlaamse Gewest v Parliament and Council
(Case T-66/19) (1)
(Action for annulment - Internal market - Fundamental freedoms - Regulation (EU) 2018/1724 - Establishment of a single digital gateway to provide access to information, to procedures and to assistance and problem-solving services - Sub-national authority - Standing to bring proceedings - Individual concern - Inadmissibility)
(2020/C 61/51)
Language of the case: Dutch
Parties
Applicants: Vlaamse Gemeenschap (Belgium) and Vlaamse Gewest (Belgium) (represented by: T. Eyskens, N. Bonbled and P. Geysens, lawyers)
Defendants: European Parliament (represented by: I. McDowell, R. van de Westelaken and M. Peternel, acting as Agents), Council of the European Union (represented by: K. Michoel and O. Segnana, acting as Agents)
Re:
Action under Article 263 TFEU seeking the annulment of Regulation (EU) 2018/1724 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 2 October 2018 establishing a single digital gateway to provide access to information, to procedures and to assistance and problem-solving services and amending Regulation (EU) No 1024/2012 (OJ 2018 L 295, p. 1).
Operative part of the order
1. |
The action is dismissed as inadmissible. |
2. |
There is no need to adjudicate on the application for leave to intervene by the European Commission. |
3. |
Vlaamse Gemeenschap and Vlaamse Gewest shall, in addition to bearing their own costs, pay those incurred by the European Parliament and by the Council of the European Union. |
4. |
The Commission shall bear its own costs relating to the application to intervene. |