Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62019CN0893

    Case C-893/19 P: Appeal brought on 3 December 2019 by Roxtec AB against the judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) delivered on 24 September 2019 in Case T-261/18, Roxtec v EUIPO — Wallmax

    IO C 279, 24.8.2020, p. 16–17 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    24.8.2020   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    C 279/16


    Appeal brought on 3 December 2019 by Roxtec AB against the judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) delivered on 24 September 2019 in Case T-261/18, Roxtec v EUIPO — Wallmax

    (Case C-893/19 P)

    (2020/C 279/22)

    Language of the case: English

    Parties

    Appellant: Roxtec AB (represented by: T. Lampel, Rechtsanwalt, K. Wagner, Rechtsanwältin, J. Olsson, advokat)

    Other parties to the proceedings: European Union Intellectual Property Office, Wallmax Srl

    By order of 12 March 2020, the Court of Justice (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) decided that the appeal should not be allowed to proceed and ordered the appellant to bear its own costs.


    Top