Access to European Union law
<a href="https://eur-lex.europa.eu/content/help/eurlex-content/experimental-features.html" target="_blank">More about the experimental features corner</a>
Choose the experimental features you want to try
EUR-Lex
Access to European Union law

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

You are here
Use quotation marks to search for an "exact phrase". Append an asterisk (*) to a search term to find variations of it (transp*, 32019R*). Use a question mark (?) instead of a single character in your search term to find variations of it (ca?e finds case, cane, care).
Search tips
Need more search options? Use the Advanced search

Document 62019CN0358

    Case C-358/19 P: Appeal brought on 6 May 2019 by PITEE Fogyasztóvédelmi Egyesület against the judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) delivered on 22 March 2019 in Case T-566/18, PITEE Fogyasztóvédelmi Egyesület v European Commission

    IO C 372, 4.11.2019, p. 9–9 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    4.11.2019   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    C 372/9

    Appeal brought on 6 May 2019 by PITEE Fogyasztóvédelmi Egyesület against the judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) delivered on 22 March 2019 in Case T-566/18, PITEE Fogyasztóvédelmi Egyesület v European Commission

    (Case C-358/19 P)

    (2019/C 372/06)

    Language of the case: German

    Parties

    Appellant: PITEE Fogyasztóvédelmi Egyesület (represented by: D. Lázár, Rechtsanwalt)

    Other party: European Commission

    By order of 26 September 2019, the Court of Justice of the European Union (Sixth Chamber) dismissed the appeal as manifestly unfounded and ordered the appellant to pay its own costs.

    Top