EUR-Lex Access to European Union law
This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62019CA0148
Case C-148/19 P: Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 7 May 2020 — BTB Holding Investments SA, Duferco Participations Holding SA v European Commission, Foreign Strategic Investments Holding (FSIH) (Appeal — State aid — Regional aid to the steel industry — Decision declaring that aid incompatible with the common market — Concept of ‘State aid’ — Advantage — Private operator test — Manifest error — Burden of proof — Limits of judicial review)
Case C-148/19 P: Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 7 May 2020 — BTB Holding Investments SA, Duferco Participations Holding SA v European Commission, Foreign Strategic Investments Holding (FSIH) (Appeal — State aid — Regional aid to the steel industry — Decision declaring that aid incompatible with the common market — Concept of ‘State aid’ — Advantage — Private operator test — Manifest error — Burden of proof — Limits of judicial review)
Case C-148/19 P: Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 7 May 2020 — BTB Holding Investments SA, Duferco Participations Holding SA v European Commission, Foreign Strategic Investments Holding (FSIH) (Appeal — State aid — Regional aid to the steel industry — Decision declaring that aid incompatible with the common market — Concept of ‘State aid’ — Advantage — Private operator test — Manifest error — Burden of proof — Limits of judicial review)
IO C 240, 20.7.2020, p. 18–18
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
20.7.2020 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 240/18 |
Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 7 May 2020 — BTB Holding Investments SA, Duferco Participations Holding SA v European Commission, Foreign Strategic Investments Holding (FSIH)
(Case C-148/19 P) (1)
(Appeal - State aid - Regional aid to the steel industry - Decision declaring that aid incompatible with the common market - Concept of ‘State aid’ - Advantage - Private operator test - Manifest error - Burden of proof - Limits of judicial review)
(2020/C 240/23)
Language of the case: French
Parties
Appellants: BTB Holding Investments SA, Duferco Participations Holding SA (represented by: J.-F. Bellis, R. Luff, M. Favert and Q. Declève, avocats)
Other parties to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: V. Bottka and G. Luengo, acting as Agents), Foreign Strategic Investments Holding (FSIH)
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
|
1. |
Dismisses the appeal; |
|
2. |
Orders BTB Holding Investments SA and Duferco Participations Holding SA to pay the costs. |