This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62018TN0289
Case T-289/18: Action brought on 4 May 2018 — Pšonka v Council
Case T-289/18: Action brought on 4 May 2018 — Pšonka v Council
Case T-289/18: Action brought on 4 May 2018 — Pšonka v Council
IO C 249, 16.7.2018, p. 38–39
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
Case T-289/18: Action brought on 4 May 2018 — Pšonka v Council
Action brought on 4 May 2018 — Pšonka v Council
(Case T-289/18)
2018/C 249/48Language of the case: CzechParties
Applicant: Artem Viktorovič Psonka (Kramatorsk, Ukraine) (represented by: M. Mleziva, lawyer)
Defendant: Council of the European Union
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
— |
Annul Council Decision (CFSP) 2018/333 of 5 March 2018 amending Decision 2014/119/CFSP concerning restrictive measures directed against certain persons, entities and bodies in view of the situation in Ukraine, and Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/326 of 5 March 2018, in so far as that Decision and that Regulation relate to the applicant. |
— |
Declare that the Council of the European Union is to bear its own costs and order it to pay the costs incurred by the applicant. |
Pleas in law and main arguments
In support of the action, the applicant relies on three pleas in law.
1. |
First plea in law, alleging an infringement of the right to sound administration.
|
2. |
Second plea in law, alleging an infringement of the applicant’s right to property.
|
3. |
Third plea in law, alleging an infringement of the applicant’s fundamental rights as guaranteed by the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms
|