Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62018TN0278

    Case T-278/18: Action brought on 4 May 2018 — Nemius Group v EUIPO (DENTALDISK)

    IO C 221, 25.6.2018, p. 37–37 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    201806080141931202018/C 221/442782018TC22120180625EN01ENINFO_JUDICIAL20180504373711

    Case T-278/18: Action brought on 4 May 2018 — Nemius Group v EUIPO (DENTALDISK)

    Top

    C2212018EN3710120180504EN0044371371

    Action brought on 4 May 2018 — Nemius Group v EUIPO (DENTALDISK)

    (Case T-278/18)

    2018/C 221/44Language of the case: German

    Parties

    Applicant: Nemius Group GmbH (Obertshausen, Germany) (represented by: C. Bildhäuser, lawyer)

    Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

    Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

    Trade mark at issue: EU word mark ‘DENTALDISK’ — Application for registration No 15 804 024

    Contested decision: Decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 30 January 2018 in Case R 741/2017-5

    Form of order sought

    The applicant claims that the Court should:

    annul the contested decision to the extent that EUIPO refused the application for registration in Class 10 and Class 35, in which the application for registration is, in any event, to be published;

    order EUIPO to pay the costs.

    Plea in law

    Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) and (c), in conjunction with Article 7(2), of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.

    Top