Access to European Union law
<a href="https://eur-lex.europa.eu/content/help/eurlex-content/experimental-features.html" target="_blank">More about the experimental features corner</a>
Choose the experimental features you want to try
EUR-Lex
Access to European Union law

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

You are here
Use quotation marks to search for an "exact phrase". Append an asterisk (*) to a search term to find variations of it (transp*, 32019R*). Use a question mark (?) instead of a single character in your search term to find variations of it (ca?e finds case, cane, care).
Search tips
Need more search options? Use the Advanced search

Document 62017TN0726

    Case T-726/17: Action brought on 24 October 2017 — Commune de Fessenheim and Others v Commission

    IO C 13, 15.1.2018, p. 23–24 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    15.1.2018   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    C 13/23

    Action brought on 24 October 2017 — Commune de Fessenheim and Others v Commission

    (Case T-726/17)

    (2018/C 013/37)

    Language of the case: French

    Parties

    Applicants: Commune de Fessenheim (Fessenheim, France), Communauté de communes Pays Rhin-Brisach (Volgelsheim, France), Conseil départemental du Haut-Rhin (Colmar, France) and Conseil régional Grand Est Alsace Champagne-Ardenne Lorraine (Strasbourg, France) (represented by: G. de Rubercy, lawyer)

    Defendant: European Commission

    Form of order sought

    The applicants claim that the Court should:

    —

    annul the decision of 10 August 2017 (GESTDEM 2017/2593) refusing to communicate to the applicants the letter from the European Commission of 22 March 2017 to the French authorities regarding the protocol for the compensation of the EDF Group in respect of the repeal of the permit to operate the Fessenheim Nuclear Power Plant;

    —

    order the European Commission to communicate that letter of 22 March 2017 to the applicants;

    —

    order the European Commission to pay all of the costs.

    Pleas in law and main arguments

    In support of the action, the applicants rely on three pleas in law.

    1.

    First plea in law, alleging infringement of the last subparagraph of Article 4(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 May 2001 regarding public access to European Parliament, Council and Commission documents (OJ 2001 L 145, p. 43).

    2.

    Second plea in law, alleging infringement of Article 42 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union relating to the right of access to documents.

    3.

    Third plea in law, alleging infringement of Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union relating to the right to an effective remedy.
    Top