Access to European Union law
<a href="https://eur-lex.europa.eu/content/help/eurlex-content/experimental-features.html" target="_blank">More about the experimental features corner</a>
Choose the experimental features you want to try
EUR-Lex
Access to European Union law

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

You are here
Use quotation marks to search for an "exact phrase". Append an asterisk (*) to a search term to find variations of it (transp*, 32019R*). Use a question mark (?) instead of a single character in your search term to find variations of it (ca?e finds case, cane, care).
Search tips
Need more search options? Use the Advanced search

Document 62017TN0717

    Case T-717/17: Action brought on 13 October 2017 — Chioreanu v ERCEA

    IO C 13, 15.1.2018, p. 21–21 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    15.1.2018   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    C 13/21

    Action brought on 13 October 2017 — Chioreanu v ERCEA

    (Case T-717/17)

    (2018/C 013/34)

    Language of the case: Romanian

    Parties

    Applicant: Nicolae Chioreanu (Oradea, Romania) (represented by: D.-C. Rusu, lawyer)

    Defendant: European Research Council Executive Agency (ERCEA)

    Form of order sought

    The applicant claims that the Court should:

    —

    annul the decision rejecting the application for review of Proposal No 741797-NIP, ERC-2016-ADG;

    —

    order the European Research Council Executive Agency to review the research proposal.

    Pleas in law and main arguments

    In support of the action, the applicant relies on a single plea in law, alleging infringement of Commission Decision C(2015) 4975 on the European Research Council rules for submission of proposals and the related evaluation, selection and award procedures relevant to the specific programme of Horizon 2020.

    Top