Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62017TN0531

    Case T-531/17: Action brought on 9 August 2017 — Promociones Santa Rosa v SRB

    IO C 369, 30.10.2017, p. 22–22 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    30.10.2017   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    C 369/22


    Action brought on 9 August 2017 — Promociones Santa Rosa v SRB

    (Case T-531/17)

    (2017/C 369/33)

    Language of the case: Spanish

    Parties

    Applicant: Promociones Santa Rosa, S.L. (Madrid, Spain) (represented by: L. Carrión Matamoros, lawyer)

    Defendant: Single Resolution Board

    Form of order sought

    The applicant claims that the General Court should:

    Annul Decision SRB/EES/2017/08 of 7 June (non-confidential version) of the Executive Committee of the Single Resolution Board adopting the resolution scheme of the Banco Popular Español, S.A., on the basis of infringement of Articles 7, 18(1) and 20 of Regulation (EU) No 806/2014, as well as the artificial alteration of the immediate causes which resulted in the institution’s resolution.

    Pleas in law and main arguments

    The pleas in law and main arguments are similar to those put forward in Cases T-478/17, Mutualidad de la Abogacía and Hermandad Nacional de Arquitectos Superiores y Químicos v Single Resolution Board, T-481/17, Fundación Tatiana Pérez de Guzmán el Bueno and SFL v Single Resolution Board, T-482/17, Comercial Vascongada Recalde v Commission and Single Resolution Board, T-483/17, García Suárez and Others v Commission and Single Resolution Board, T-484/17, Fidesban and Others v Single Resolution Board, T-497/17, Sáchez del Valle and Calatrava Real State 2015 v Commission and Single Resolution Board, and T-498/17, Pablo Álvarez de Linera Granda v Commission and Single Resolution Board.


    Top