This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62017TN0040
Case T-40/17: Action brought on 19 January 2017 — Habermaaß v EUIPO — Here Global (h)
Case T-40/17: Action brought on 19 January 2017 — Habermaaß v EUIPO — Here Global (h)
Case T-40/17: Action brought on 19 January 2017 — Habermaaß v EUIPO — Here Global (h)
IO C 86, 20.3.2017, p. 30–31
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
20.3.2017 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 86/30 |
Action brought on 19 January 2017 — Habermaaß v EUIPO — Here Global (h)
(Case T-40/17)
(2017/C 086/40)
Language in which the application was lodged: English
Parties
Applicant: Habermaaß GmbH AG (Bad Rodach, Germany) (represented by: U. Blumenröder, H. Gauß and E. Bertram, lawyers)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Here Global BV (Eindhoven, The Netherlands)
Details of the proceedings before EUIPO
Applicant of the trade mark at issue: Applicant
Trade mark at issue: EU figurative mark containing the word element ‘h’ — Application for registration No 12 833 141
Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings
Contested decision: Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 24 October 2016 in Case R 53/2016-2
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
|
— |
annul the contested decision; |
|
— |
order EUIPO to pay the costs. |
Pleas in law
|
— |
Infringement of Articles 8(1)(b) and 41 of Regulation No 207/2009; |
|
— |
Infringement of the legal principles to be considered when applying and interpreting the Regulation No 207/2009; |
|
— |
Infringement of Article 135(4) of the Rules of procedure. |