This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62016TN0896
Case T-896/16: Action brought on 20 December 2016 — Puma v EUIPO — Senator (TRINOMIC)
Case T-896/16: Action brought on 20 December 2016 — Puma v EUIPO — Senator (TRINOMIC)
Case T-896/16: Action brought on 20 December 2016 — Puma v EUIPO — Senator (TRINOMIC)
IO C 53, 20.2.2017, p. 39–39
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
20.2.2017 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 53/39 |
Action brought on 20 December 2016 — Puma v EUIPO — Senator (TRINOMIC)
(Case T-896/16)
(2017/C 053/47)
Language in which the application was lodged: German
Parties
Applicant: Puma SE (Herzogenaurach, Germany) (represented by: M. Schunke, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Senator GmbH & Co. KGaA (Groß-Bieberau, Germany)
Details of the proceedings before EUIPO
Applicant for the trade mark at issue: Applicant
Trade mark at issue: EU word mark ‘TRINOMIC’ — Application No 12 697 074
Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings
Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 19 October 2016 in Case R 70/2016-4
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
|
— |
annul the contested decision; |
|
— |
order the defendant to pay the costs of the proceedings, including those incurred in the appeal proceedings. |
Pleas in law
|
— |
Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009; |
|
— |
Infringement of the principle of equal treatment and of the principle that the administration is bound by its own decisions. |