Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62016TA0331

    Case T-331/16: Judgment of the General Court of 26 October 2017 — Hello Media Group v EUIPO — Hola (
    hello media group) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU figurative mark
    hello media group — Earlier EU figurative and word marks HELLO! — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001))

    IO C 424, 11.12.2017, p. 31–31 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    11.12.2017   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    C 424/31


    Judgment of the General Court of 26 October 2017 — Hello Media Group v EUIPO — Hola (#hello media group)

    (Case T-331/16) (1)

    ((EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for EU figurative mark #hello media group - Earlier EU figurative and word marks HELLO! - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)))

    (2017/C 424/44)

    Language of the case: Spanish

    Parties

    Applicant: Hello Media Group, SL (Madrid, Spain), authorised to replace Hello Media, SL (represented by: A. Alejos Cutuli, lawyer)

    Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: J. Crespo Carrillo, acting as Agent)

    Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Hola, SL (Madrid) (represented by: F. Arroyo Álvarez de Toledo, lawyer)

    Re:

    Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 21 April 2016 (Case R 2012/2015-2), relating to opposition proceedings between Hola and Hello Media.

    Operative part of the judgment

    The Court:

    1.

    Dismisses the action;

    2.

    Orders Hello Media Group, SL, to pay the costs.


    (1)  OJ C 296, 16.8.2016.


    Top