Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62016CB0549

    Case C-549/16: Order of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 12 October 2017 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Commissione tributaria di Secondo Grado di Bolzano — Italy) — Agenzia delle Entrate — Direzione provinciale Ufficio controlli di Bolzano v Palais Kaiserkron Srl (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Taxation — Common system of value added tax (VAT) — Directive 2006/112/EC — Article 401 — Concept of ‘turnover tax’ — Leasing of immovable property used for the purposes of trade — Liability to pay registration duty and VAT)

    IO C 424, 11.12.2017, p. 15–15 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    11.12.2017   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    C 424/15


    Order of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 12 October 2017 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Commissione tributaria di Secondo Grado di Bolzano — Italy) — Agenzia delle Entrate — Direzione provinciale Ufficio controlli di Bolzano v Palais Kaiserkron Srl

    (Case C-549/16) (1)

    ((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Taxation - Common system of value added tax (VAT) - Directive 2006/112/EC - Article 401 - Concept of ‘turnover tax’ - Leasing of immovable property used for the purposes of trade - Liability to pay registration duty and VAT))

    (2017/C 424/21)

    Language of the case: Italian

    Referring court

    Commissione tributaria di Secondo Grado di Bolzano

    Parties to the main proceedings

    Applicant: Agenzia delle Entrate — Direzione provinciale Ufficio controlli di Bolzano

    Defendant: Palais Kaiserkron Srl

    Operative part of the order

    Article 401 of Council Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax must be interpreted as not precluding the charging of a proportional registration duty affecting commercial leases, such as that laid down by the national legislation at issue in the main proceedings, even when those leases are also subject to value added tax.


    (1)  OJ C 30, 30.01.2017


    Top