This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62015TN0569
Case T-569/15: Action brought on 25 September 2015 — Fondazione Casamica v Commission and EASME
Case T-569/15: Action brought on 25 September 2015 — Fondazione Casamica v Commission and EASME
Case T-569/15: Action brought on 25 September 2015 — Fondazione Casamica v Commission and EASME
IO C 398, 30.11.2015, p. 69–70
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
30.11.2015 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 398/69 |
Action brought on 25 September 2015 — Fondazione Casamica v Commission and EASME
(Case T-569/15)
(2015/C 398/83)
Language of the case: Italian
Parties
Applicant: Fondazione Casamica (Salerno, Italy) (represented by: M. Lamberti, lawyer)
Defendants: Executive Agency for Small and Medium-sized enterprises (EASME), European Commission
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the General Court should:
— |
annul the contested measure: Results of the evaluation — Ineligible proposal. Proposal: A4A, 699442 — Decision ref. Ares (2015)3187639, notified on 29 July 2015, adopted by the European Commission, EASME Executive Agency for Small and Medium-sized enterprises, inasmuch as it is unlawful for the reasons stated; |
— |
declare the proposal to participate, Proposal number A4A, 699442, acronym A4A, title: Archaeology 4 All, to be suitable and admit to the tender procedure the applicant and its partners, within the framework of the consortium formed for the purpose of taking part in that procedure. |
Pleas in law and main arguments
The call for proposals forming the subject-matter of this action is intended to establish, define and develop a model for accessible tourism which, after identifying the difficulties linked to disabilities, overcomes them by means of a standard model which represents an appropriate response and may be offered at every site of cultural and archaeological interest.
The eligibility requirements for submitting a project included, in addition to specialised and long-standing experience in the specific sector and in addition to a legal person closely associated with the objectives of the proposal, the presence of a national, regional or local governmental authority.
In support of the action, the applicant relies on two pleas in law.
1. |
First plea in law, concerning the eligibility of the proposal.
|
2. |
Second plea in law, concerning the legal nature of the Soprintendenza, a partner in the consortium
|