This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62014TN0525
Case T-525/14: Action brought on 13 July 2014 — Compagnie générale des établissements Michelin v OHIM — Continental Reifen Deutschland (XKING)
Case T-525/14: Action brought on 13 July 2014 — Compagnie générale des établissements Michelin v OHIM — Continental Reifen Deutschland (XKING)
Case T-525/14: Action brought on 13 July 2014 — Compagnie générale des établissements Michelin v OHIM — Continental Reifen Deutschland (XKING)
IO C 303, 8.9.2014, p. 51–51
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
8.9.2014 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 303/51 |
Action brought on 13 July 2014 — Compagnie générale des établissements Michelin v OHIM — Continental Reifen Deutschland (XKING)
(Case T-525/14)
2014/C 303/60
Language in which the application was lodged: English
Parties
Applicant: Compagnie générale des établissements Michelin (Clermont-Ferrand, France) (represented by: L. Carlini, lawyer)
Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Continental Reifen Deutschland GmbH (Hannover, Germany)
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
|
— |
Annul the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 5 May 2014 given in Case R 1522/2013-4; |
|
— |
Order the defendant and the other party to the proceedings, should it intervene, to pay the costs of the proceedings. |
Pleas in law and main arguments
Applicant for a Community trade mark: The other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal
Community trade mark concerned: The figurative mark containing the verbal elements ‘XKING’ for goods in Class 12 — Community trade mark application No 1 0 6 44 821
Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: The applicant
Mark or sign cited in opposition: Community trademarks Nos 5 2 93 782 and 5 5 60 396, national marks an international registrations
Decision of the Opposition Division: Upheld the opposition in its entirety
Decision of the Board of Appeal: Annulled the contested decision and rejected the opposition
Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) and (5) CTMR