This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62013TN0506
Case T-506/13: Action brought on 20 September 2013 — Urb Rulmenti Suceava v OHIM — Adiguzel (URB)
Case T-506/13: Action brought on 20 September 2013 — Urb Rulmenti Suceava v OHIM — Adiguzel (URB)
Case T-506/13: Action brought on 20 September 2013 — Urb Rulmenti Suceava v OHIM — Adiguzel (URB)
IO C 352, 30.11.2013, p. 17–17
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
30.11.2013 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 352/17 |
Action brought on 20 September 2013 — Urb Rulmenti Suceava v OHIM — Adiguzel (URB)
(Case T-506/13)
2013/C 352/32
Language in which the application was lodged: English
Parties
Applicant: Urb Rulmenti Suceava SA (Suceava, Romania) (represented by: I. Burdusel, lawyer)
Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Harun Adiguzel (Diosd, Hungary)
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
|
— |
Annul the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 12 July 2013 given in Case R 1309/2012-4; |
|
— |
Order the defendant to pay the costs of present proceedings; and |
|
— |
Order the other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal to pay the costs incurred during the proceedings before the OHIM. |
Pleas in law and main arguments
Registered Community trade mark in respect of which a declaration of invalidity has been sought: The word mark ‘URB’ for goods in Classes 6 and 7 — Community trade mark registration No 7 380 009
Proprietor of the Community trade mark: The other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal
Applicant for the declaration of invalidity of the Community trade mark: The applicant
Grounds for the application for a declaration of invalidity: Absolute grounds for invalidity under Article 52(1)(b) CTMR and relative grounds for invalidity under Article 8(1)(b) in conjunction with Article 53(1)(a) CTMR
Decision of the Cancellation Division: Rejected the request for a declaration of invalidity
Decision of the Board of Appeal: Dismissed the appeal
Pleas in law: Infringement of Articles 52(1)(b), 53(1)(a) and 72 CTMR.