Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62013TN0333

    Case T-333/13: Action brought on 17 June 2013 — Westermann Lernspielverlag/OHIM — Diset (bambinoLÜK)

    IO C 252, 31.8.2013, p. 36–36 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
    IO C 252, 31.8.2013, p. 23–23 (HR)

    31.8.2013   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    C 252/36


    Action brought on 17 June 2013 — Westermann Lernspielverlag/OHIM — Diset (bambinoLÜK)

    (Case T-333/13)

    2013/C 252/60

    Language in which the application was lodged: English

    Parties

    Applicant: Westermann Lernspielverlag GmbH (Braunschweig, Germany) (represented by: A. Nordemann, lawyer)

    Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

    Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Diset, SA (Barcelona, Spain)

    Form of order sought

    The applicant claims that the Court should:

    Annul the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) [OHIM] of 3 April 2013, Case R 1323/2012-2, relating to the opposition proceedings No. B 1 724 593 [Community trade mark application 009080359] between DISET, S.A. and Westermann Lernspielverlag GmbH;

    Order the Defendant to bear the costs.

    Pleas in law and main arguments

    Applicant for a Community trade mark: The applicant

    Community trade mark concerned: The figurative mark ‘bambinoLÜK’, for goods in classes 9, 16 and 28 — Community trade mark application No 9 080 359

    Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: The other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

    Mark or sign cited in opposition: Community trade mark of the figurative mark ‘BAMBINO’ for goods in classes 16, 28 and 41

    Decision of the Opposition Division: Partly upheld the opposition

    Decision of the Board of Appeal: Partly upheld the appeal and allows the CTM application to proceed for certain goods of class 9

    Pleas in law: Infringement of Articles 8(1)(b) Council Regulation No 207/2009.


    Top