This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62013FA0053
Case F-53/13: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Third Chamber) of 26 February 2014 — Diamantopoulos v EEAS (Civil service — Officials — Promotion — Decision not to promote the applicant to grade AD 12 — Implied decision rejecting the complaint — Express decision rejecting the complaint subsequent to the action — Statement of reasons)
Case F-53/13: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Third Chamber) of 26 February 2014 — Diamantopoulos v EEAS (Civil service — Officials — Promotion — Decision not to promote the applicant to grade AD 12 — Implied decision rejecting the complaint — Express decision rejecting the complaint subsequent to the action — Statement of reasons)
Case F-53/13: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Third Chamber) of 26 February 2014 — Diamantopoulos v EEAS (Civil service — Officials — Promotion — Decision not to promote the applicant to grade AD 12 — Implied decision rejecting the complaint — Express decision rejecting the complaint subsequent to the action — Statement of reasons)
IO C 102, 7.4.2014, p. 44–44
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
7.4.2014 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 102/44 |
Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Third Chamber) of 26 February 2014 — Diamantopoulos v EEAS
(Case F-53/13) (1)
((Civil service - Officials - Promotion - Decision not to promote the applicant to grade AD 12 - Implied decision rejecting the complaint - Express decision rejecting the complaint subsequent to the action - Statement of reasons))
2014/C 102/64
Language of the case: French
Parties
Applicant: Alkis Diamantopoulos (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: S. Orlandi, J.-N. Louis and D. Abreu Caldas, lawyers)
Defendant: European External Action Service (EEAS) (represented by: S. Marquardt and E. Chaboureau, acting as Agents)
Re:
Application for annulment of the decision not to promote the applicant to grade AD 12 in the 2012 promotion year.
Operative part of the judgment
The Tribunal:
|
1. |
Annuls the decision of the European External Action Service not to promote Mr Diamantopoulos to grade AD 12 in the 2012 promotion exercise; |
|
2. |
Declares that the European External Action Service is to bear its own costs and orders it to pay the costs incurred by Mr Diamantopoulos. |
(1) OJ C 215, 27.7.2013, p. 20.