This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62013CN0319
Case C-319/13: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Thüringer Oberlandesgericht (Germany) lodged on 11 June 2013 — Udo Rätzke v S+K Handels GmbH
Case C-319/13: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Thüringer Oberlandesgericht (Germany) lodged on 11 June 2013 — Udo Rätzke v S+K Handels GmbH
Case C-319/13: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Thüringer Oberlandesgericht (Germany) lodged on 11 June 2013 — Udo Rätzke v S+K Handels GmbH
IO C 260, 7.9.2013, p. 22–22
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
IO C 260, 7.9.2013, p. 19–19
(HR)
|
7.9.2013 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 260/22 |
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Thüringer Oberlandesgericht (Germany) lodged on 11 June 2013 — Udo Rätzke v S+K Handels GmbH
(Case C-319/13)
2013/C 260/38
Language of the case: German
Referring court
Thüringer Oberlandesgericht
Parties to the main proceedings
Appellant: Udo Rätzke
Respondant: S+K Handels GmbH
Questions referred
Is Article 4(a) of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) No 1062/2010 (1) of 28 September 2010 supplementing Directive 2010/30/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council with regard to energy labelling of televisions to be interpreted as meaning that dealers are subject to an obligation to label televisions (from 30 November 2011) only if those televisions were supplied by the supplier together with the relevant label (from 30 November 2011) in accordance with Article 3(1)(a) of that regulation, or does the labelling obligation also apply to dealers (from 30 November 2011) in respect of televisions supplied by suppliers before 30 November 2011 without the relevant labels, so that dealers are obliged to request suppliers (in good time, subsequently) to provide labels for those televisions?
(1) OJ L 314, p. 64.