Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62013CN0206

    Case C-206/13: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale per la Sicilia (Italy) lodged on 18 April 2013 — Cruciano Siragusa v Regione Sicilia — Soprintendenza Beni Culturali e Ambientali di Palermo

    IO C 207, 20.7.2013, p. 10–10 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
    IO C 207, 20.7.2013, p. 4–4 (HR)

    20.7.2013   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    C 207/10


    Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale per la Sicilia (Italy) lodged on 18 April 2013 — Cruciano Siragusa v Regione Sicilia — Soprintendenza Beni Culturali e Ambientali di Palermo

    (Case C-206/13)

    2013/C 207/17

    Language of the case: Italian

    Referring court

    Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale per la Sicilia

    Parties to the main proceedings

    Applicant: Cruciano Siragusa

    Defendant: Regione Sicilia — Soprintendenza Beni Culturali e Ambientali di Palermo

    Questions referred

    Do Article 17 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union and the principle of proportionality, as a general principle of European Union law, preclude the application of a provision of national law such as Article 167(4)(a) of Legislative Decree No 42 of 2004, under which a ‘landscape compatibility clearance’ [(autorizzazione paesaggistica)] may not be issued by way of retrospective regularisation in any cases where human activity has resulted in an increase in floor area and volume, regardless of whether a specific appraisal has been undertaken as to whether the activity in question is compatible with the features of the landscape of the particular site which merit protection?


    Top