This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62012CN0474
Case C-474/12: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgerichtshof (Austria) lodged on 22 October 2012 — Schiebel Aircraft GmbH v Bundesminister für Wirtschaft, Familie und Jugend
Case C-474/12: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgerichtshof (Austria) lodged on 22 October 2012 — Schiebel Aircraft GmbH v Bundesminister für Wirtschaft, Familie und Jugend
Case C-474/12: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgerichtshof (Austria) lodged on 22 October 2012 — Schiebel Aircraft GmbH v Bundesminister für Wirtschaft, Familie und Jugend
IO C 26, 26.1.2013, p. 20–20
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
26.1.2013 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 26/20 |
Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgerichtshof (Austria) lodged on 22 October 2012 — Schiebel Aircraft GmbH v Bundesminister für Wirtschaft, Familie und Jugend
(Case C-474/12)
2013/C 26/37
Language of the case: German
Referring court
Verwaltungsgerichtshof
Parties to the main proceedings
Applicant: Schiebel Aircraft GmbH
Defendant: Bundesminister für Wirtschaft, Familie und Jugend
Question referred
Does Union law, and in particular Articles 18, 45 and 49, in conjunction with Article 346(1)(b) TFEU, preclude a national provision such as the rule applicable in the main proceedings, whereby the members of the statutorily appointed bodies or shareholders of commercial undertakings authorised to manage and represent companies wishing to carry on the business of trading in military arms and munitions and the brokering of the sale and purchase of military arms and munitions, must possess Austrian nationality, the possession of the nationality of another Member State of the EEA not being sufficient?