EUR-Lex Access to European Union law
This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62011TN0182
Case T-182/11: Action brought on 28 March 2011 — Dacoury-Tabley v Council
Case T-182/11: Action brought on 28 March 2011 — Dacoury-Tabley v Council
Case T-182/11: Action brought on 28 March 2011 — Dacoury-Tabley v Council
IO C 152, 21.5.2011, p. 29–29
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
21.5.2011 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 152/29 |
Action brought on 28 March 2011 — Dacoury-Tabley v Council
(Case T-182/11)
2011/C 152/51
Language of the case: French
Parties
Applicant: Philippe Henry Dacoury-Tabley (Abidjan, Côte d’Ivoire) (represented by: G. Collard, lawyer)
Defendant: Council of the European Union
Forms of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
— |
declare that, concerning the applicant, Mr Philippe Henry DACOURY-TABLEY, Council Regulation No 85/2011 of 31 January 2011, published on 2 February 2011 in the Official Journal of the European Union, and Council Decision 2011/71/CFSP of 31 January 2011, published on 2 February 2011 in the Official Journal of the European Union, have no factual basis, |
— |
accordingly,
|
Pleas in law and main arguments
In support of the action, the applicant relies on two pleas in law.
1. |
First plea in law, alleging breach of the obligation to state reasons, since the reasons for including the applicant in the list of persons and entities to which the restrictive measures apply are stereotypical, with no mention of any precise factual evidence which allow the assessment of the relevance of that inclusion, |
2. |
Second plea in law, alleging a manifest error of assessment in so far as
|