Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62011TN0171

    Case T-171/11: Action brought on 21 March 2011 — Hopf v OHIM (Clampflex)

    IO C 145, 14.5.2011, p. 35–35 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    14.5.2011   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    C 145/35


    Action brought on 21 March 2011 — Hopf v OHIM (Clampflex)

    (Case T-171/11)

    2011/C 145/58

    Language of the case: German

    Parties

    Applicant: Hans-Jürgen Hopf (Zirndorf, Germany) (represented by V. Mensing, lawyer)

    Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

    Form of order sought

    Annul the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 19 January 2011 in Case R 1514/2010-4;

    Order OHIM to pay the costs, including those incurred in the course of the appeal procedure.

    Pleas in law and main arguments

    Community trade mark concerned: the word mark ‘Clampflex’ for goods in Classes 5, 9, 10, 17 and 20

    Decision of the Examiner: partial rejection of the application

    Decision of the Board of Appeal: dismissal of the appeal

    Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (1) as the Community trade mark in question has distinctive character and is not descriptive


    (1)  Council Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 of 26 February 2009 on the Community trade mark (OJ 2009 L 78, p. 1)


    Top