This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62011TB0126
Case T-126/11 P: Order of the General Court of 8 March 2012 — Marcuccio v Commission (Appeal — Civil service — Officials — Social security — Reimbursement of medical expenses — Act adversely affecting an official — Implied refusal — Duty to state reasons — Appeal in part manifestly unfounded and in part manifestly inadmissible)
Case T-126/11 P: Order of the General Court of 8 March 2012 — Marcuccio v Commission (Appeal — Civil service — Officials — Social security — Reimbursement of medical expenses — Act adversely affecting an official — Implied refusal — Duty to state reasons — Appeal in part manifestly unfounded and in part manifestly inadmissible)
Case T-126/11 P: Order of the General Court of 8 March 2012 — Marcuccio v Commission (Appeal — Civil service — Officials — Social security — Reimbursement of medical expenses — Act adversely affecting an official — Implied refusal — Duty to state reasons — Appeal in part manifestly unfounded and in part manifestly inadmissible)
IO C 126, 28.4.2012, p. 17–17
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
28.4.2012 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 126/17 |
Order of the General Court of 8 March 2012 — Marcuccio v Commission
(Case T-126/11 P) (1)
(Appeal - Civil service - Officials - Social security - Reimbursement of medical expenses - Act adversely affecting an official - Implied refusal - Duty to state reasons - Appeal in part manifestly unfounded and in part manifestly inadmissible)
2012/C 126/35
Language of the case: Italian
Parties
Appellant: Luigi Marcuccio (Tricase, Italy) (represented by: G. Cipressa, lawyer)
Other party to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: J. Curall and C. Berardis-Kayser, acting as Agents, and A. Dal Ferro, lawyer)
Re:
Appeal against the judgment delivered by the European Union Civil Service Tribunal (single judge) on 14 December 2010 in Case F-1/10 Marcuccio v Commission, not yet published in the ECR, seeking the annulment in part of that judgment.
Operative part of the order
1. |
The appeal is dismissed in part as manifestly inadmissible and in part as manifestly devoid of any basis in law. |
2. |
The cross-appeal is dismissed in part as manifestly inadmissible and in part as manifestly devoid of any basis in law. |
3. |
Mr Luigi Marcuccio shall bear his own costs and shall pay the costs incurred by the European Commission in the appeal. |
4. |
Each party shall bear its own costs of the cross-appeal. |