EUR-Lex Access to European Union law
This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62010FA0074
Case F-74/10: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 29 September 2011 — Kimman v Commission (Staff cases — Civil servants — Article 43 of the Staff Regulations — Article 45 of the Staff Regulations — 2009 appraisal — Classification in a level of performance — Decision awarding promotion points — Appraisal report — Opinion of the ad hoc group — Infringement of the duty to give reasons — Plea raised of its own motion — Burden of proof)
Case F-74/10: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 29 September 2011 — Kimman v Commission (Staff cases — Civil servants — Article 43 of the Staff Regulations — Article 45 of the Staff Regulations — 2009 appraisal — Classification in a level of performance — Decision awarding promotion points — Appraisal report — Opinion of the ad hoc group — Infringement of the duty to give reasons — Plea raised of its own motion — Burden of proof)
Case F-74/10: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 29 September 2011 — Kimman v Commission (Staff cases — Civil servants — Article 43 of the Staff Regulations — Article 45 of the Staff Regulations — 2009 appraisal — Classification in a level of performance — Decision awarding promotion points — Appraisal report — Opinion of the ad hoc group — Infringement of the duty to give reasons — Plea raised of its own motion — Burden of proof)
IO C 138, 12.5.2012, p. 24–24
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
12.5.2012 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 138/24 |
Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 29 September 2011 — Kimman v Commission
(Case F-74/10) (1)
(Staff cases - Civil servants - Article 43 of the Staff Regulations - Article 45 of the Staff Regulations - 2009 appraisal - Classification in a level of performance - Decision awarding promotion points - Appraisal report - Opinion of the ad hoc group - Infringement of the duty to give reasons - Plea raised of its own motion - Burden of proof)
(2012/C 138/47)
Language of the case: French
Parties
Applicant: Eugène Émile Kimman (Overijse, Belgium) (represented by: L. Levi, lawyer)
Defendant: European Commission (represented by: G. Berscheid and P. Pecho, acting as Agents)
Re:
Application to annul the applicant’s staff report for 2008
Operative part of the judgment
The Tribunal:
|
1. |
Dismisses the action; |
|
2. |
Orders the European Commission to bear a quarter of the applicant’s costs, in addition to its own costs; |
|
3. |
Orders the applicant to pay three quarters of his own costs. |