This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62010FA0023
Case F-23/10: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Third Chamber) of 28 September 2011 — Allen v Commission (Civil service — Social security — Serious illness — Article 72 of the Staff Regulations — Extension of sickness cover under the JSIS — Criterion of absence of insurance under another scheme)
Case F-23/10: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Third Chamber) of 28 September 2011 — Allen v Commission (Civil service — Social security — Serious illness — Article 72 of the Staff Regulations — Extension of sickness cover under the JSIS — Criterion of absence of insurance under another scheme)
Case F-23/10: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Third Chamber) of 28 September 2011 — Allen v Commission (Civil service — Social security — Serious illness — Article 72 of the Staff Regulations — Extension of sickness cover under the JSIS — Criterion of absence of insurance under another scheme)
IO C 362, 10.12.2011, p. 23–23
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
10.12.2011 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 362/23 |
Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Third Chamber) of 28 September 2011 — Allen v Commission
(Case F-23/10) (1)
(Civil service - Social security - Serious illness - Article 72 of the Staff Regulations - Extension of sickness cover under the JSIS - Criterion of absence of insurance under another scheme)
2011/C 362/38
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: Finola Allen (Armacão de Pera, Portugal) (represented by: L. Levi and A. Blot, lawyers)
Defendant: Commission (represented by: J. Currall and D. Martin, Agents)
Re:
Action for annulment of the decision to reject the application for recognition that the applicant has a serious illness.
Operative part of the judgment
The Tribunal:
|
1. |
Annuls the decisions of 30 June 2009, 17 July 2009 and 7 January 2010 by which the European Commission refused to recognise that Ms Allen was suffering from a serious illness and refused to extend her sickness cover; |
|
2. |
Dismisses the action as to the remainder of the heads of claim; |
|
3. |
Orders the European Commission to bear all the costs. |
(1) OJ C 161, 19.6.2010, p. 58.