Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62007TA0446

    Case T-446/07: Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 15 September 2009 — Royal Appliance International v OHIM — BSH Bosch und Siemens Hausgeräte (Centrixx) (Community trade mark — Opposition procedure — Application for Community word mark Centrixx — Earlier national word mark sensixx — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 8(1) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)

    IO C 256, 24.10.2009, p. 25–25 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    24.10.2009   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    C 256/25


    Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 15 September 2009 — Royal Appliance International v OHIM — BSH Bosch und Siemens Hausgeräte (Centrixx)

    (Case T-446/07) (1)

    (Community trade mark - Opposition procedure - Application for Community word mark Centrixx - Earlier national word mark sensixx - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 8(1) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)

    2009/C 256/45

    Language of the case: German

    Parties

    Applicant: Royal Appliance International GmbH (Hilden, Germany) (represented by: K.-J. Michaeli and M. Schork, lawyers)

    Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: S. Schäffner and B. Schmidt, Agents)

    Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM intervening before the Court of First Instance: BSH Bosch und Siemens Hausgeräte GmbH (Munich, Germany) (represented by: S. Biagosch, lawyer)

    Re:

    Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 3 October 2007 (Case R 572/2006-4) concerning opposition proceedings between BSH Bosch und Siemens Hausgeräte GmbH and Royal Appliance International GmbH.

    Operative part of the judgment

    The Court:

    1.

    Dismisses the action;

    2.

    Orders Royal Appliance International GmbH to pay the costs.


    (1)  OJ C 37, 9.2.2008.


    Top